Skip to main content

Once upon a time ...



Once upon a time a long time ago, the first story happened. Was it spoken? Was it drawn on the wall of a cave? Was it danced? Was it sang? Did it have rhythm? Was it memorable? Who was the witness and who was the storyteller? Only God knows and that’s only if there’s a God.
Millions of years later, not only were humans still sharing stories, some of these humans got curious about why we are drawn to stories, what deeper meanings lie in the forms we use to tell them, and how we could define the parts of these stories.
You want to know what’s wrong with these narratologists? They’re putting clashing definitions on what we call stories. Each of them is interested in some sub-genre of narrative study, and it shows. For the life of me, I can’t get the definitions straight. So, let’s check our handy-dandy notebook and see what we’ve got. Ah, yes.
“The narrative paradigm is a worldview of human communication,” says Walter Fisher.
“Narrative is the process of grammatical structuration within language and an object of rigorous, even scientific analysis,” says Martin McQuillan.
“Narrative is the representation of an event or a series of events,” says Hannah Porter Abbott.
It gets worse as far as clashing definitions, but the above are some of the clearest I’ve got in my notes so far. I keep trying to simplify every piece I read, but the more definitions I underline during my reading sessions, the more confused my annotations get. Is there an end to the definitions? Is there going to be a matching quiz with the definitions on one side and the terms on the other? I’m going to need some flashcards. This community of narratologists isn’t even a community – it’s just a grouping of academics looking to distinguish their own ideas about what narrative is and how we can tear it apart and put it back together. Just to be clear, there’s nothing wrong with that, but it makes the study of this field confusing.
Are we viewing stories—sorry, narrative—as behavior models? A way to pass down practical wisdom? A way to relay events that have happened? Something to enjoy before bed for no reason but amusement?
Narrative, as it’s been explained to me so far, is the structure of communication that parallels the cognitive processes in our human brains. It’s the way we construct a telling of anything – poems, plays, fictions, life stories, etc. And the study of it is complex and varied; each author that I’ve read so far has made it very clear to the reader what his or her premise is in the field, and that’s because the field is so varied across the board. They each create their own ways to study narrative and therefore throw definitions out like candy at a parade.
Well. I’m done. Maybe I’d understand the field better if it were laid out in narrative form.  

edit: That being said, this link was one of the most helpful things I've read so far. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Melanie and Melanie: Growing up with Separated Lesbian Moms in the South

I came from a sperm bank, well I came from a vagina, but first I came from a sperm bank. That’s not generally my opener, but we need to make it clear. My moms discovered their sexuality long before I came along in 1992. When I was three, they separated. Gay marriage had not been legalized up to this point, so there was no divorce process involved. However, my mama, Sharon, she gave birth to me, and she wanted full custody of me. My other mom, Sylvia, worked tirelessly to pay for my existence and Sharon’s pregnancy care; she loved me, and I was her child no matter what. They went to court, and Sylvia became one of the first lesbian parents in the state of Texas to receive shared custody of a child that was not biologically hers. In some cases, this still doesn’t always happen, particularly in cases with gay and lesbian parents, regardless of how involved the parent is in their child’s life. “Who do you want to live with?” Flash forward seven years or so, and I’m being given more

Voices from Below

It is, to my mind, an undeniable fact that all areas of academic study benefit from the effective use of narrative. Literature, history, and the arts are natural candidates, yet even the maths and sciences can be enriched by including the human voices of those involved, telling us the story of what they discovered, how they did it, and what it means for humanity. What strikes me, though, is that the voices of those on the ground outside of the ivory tower of academe are still rarely heard, and even more rarely acknowledged and valued. In history, I want to hear more of the voices of those who did not "win," the so-called conquered peoples, the indigenous peoples, those crushed under the heel of imperialism. Some corrective measures have been taken to include these voices in the last few decades, but I know there is mountains more to be discovered. In the field of medical science, I want to hear the voices of those who unwillingly gave up their lives for our knowledge of

Needs more academic lingo

So I heard something funny on a podcast this weekend and it really struck a chord. The hosts, sweet souls that they are, were talking about people who become professors and how they must do it because they really care. After all, it’s not like they’re trying to get famous. I laughed, a lot, because seriously, what academic isn’t trying to make a name for themselves? Becoming faculty means writing and publishing, and getting your name out there while trying to break fresh ground on old material. That’s incredibly clear, given the amount of narrative theory ideas we read about this week.   And the more theories that are created, the more TERMS there are. They’re just everywhere… chrono-logic, fabula, sjuzet, catalyzers.   I mean, I get it, in the basics, but what kills me is how many  different ideas can be created to explain the how’s and why’s of story and narrative. I’ve tried to find a kind of unified theory of narrative theory, and so far, the names t