Skip to main content

According to Plan

Image
By



One of the best representations that I can think of in regards to a narrative violating its own canon of probability is The Dark Knight (2008). This movie is great for so many reasons, but one of the most intriguing characteristics of it is how an antagonist within this movie breaks and violates Gotham City’s canon of probability. Can you guess who?


Known to be one of the most popular and complex characters in the DC Universe, the Joker is no stranger to upsetting the established order. In The Dark Knight, the “Crown Prince of Crime” expertly manipulates his multiple personalities (and cronies) with the different scenarios he’s presented with as he torments Gotham. The first ten minutes of the movie integrates suspense with canon of probability. We see several robbers with clown masks robbing the bank; any one of those masked criminals could be the Joker. However, due to his expert manipulation tactics, he sets up a chain that takes care of its own lose ends. As each step of the robbery is completed, a clowned criminal is killed. When I first saw the movie in theaters, I was actually worried that the Joker would get shot and/or hurt in some way during the bank robbery.


Crazy, right? The Joker’s craft, and style, along with his devil-may-care attitude, had me rooting for him, rather than Batman, for the entire movie. Especially in the scene that I’m going to discuss below.

However, I needn’t have worried—the Joker would show his true skill later on against Batman, Gordon, and Co. 

There’s one scene in the move that beautifully manifests a character/narrative violating the canon of probability. As the Joker works on blowing up Gotham General Hospital, comes face-to-face with Two-Face. Otherwise known as Harvey Dent. During their conversation, the Joker makes a very true statement: When the citizens of Gotham (and us viewers) know something bad is going to happen, we don’t panic. Before we went to see this movie, we as viewers knew in some regard that something bad was going to happen. Unless we had expert knowledge of comic lore, or the script, or the director’s intentions, we did not know when all hell was going to break lose.
Here's the hospital scene:

The Dark Knight (2008) Hospital Scene

Okay, so the Joker did blow up the hospital in the end, but he accomplished much more than that. He single-handedly turned all of the prescribed plans, or rules, of the government and police upside down, and instituted chaos as order. As macabre as it is, Two-Face/Harvey Dent could not fully blame the Joker for Rachel’s death because the Joker did not plan to kill Batman, Dent, or Rachel. The Joker used the high probability that Gotham’s citizens would simply be immersed in a call-response mentality of a criminal completing a crime—no matter the amount of blood spilled, money stolen, or lives lost.

Heath Ledger did a magnificent job of embodying the Joker's wild-card nature. Despite the best efforts of Gotham's police forces, no one (especially the viewers) could anticipate the Joker's next move solely because he upset their realms of probability. He did not prescribe to a supposed plan, and he even attempted to gather help from notorious criminals to complete his agenda; but, they refused him because he was different and did not follow the characteristics of what they deemed to be a world-class criminal.

I'll leave you with an iconic quote from the Joker during his conversation with Harvey Dent:

"Introduce a little anarchy. Upset the established order, and everything becomes chaos. I'm an agent of chaos. Oh, and you the thing about chaos? It's fair" (The Dark Knight).

The really ironic part is....he's right.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"You don't look like your dad!" Tales of Legal Adoption

By Anonymous
"You don't look like your dad. You must be the spitting image of your mother!" or "Your brothers look just like your dad! I bet you take after your momma." I heard these statements a lot growing up. And it's true. I don't look like my dad. And for a while, I didn't really look like my mom. I do now, but that isn't the point. You see, my dad adopted me when I was around six or seven years old. He had been a part of my life, for, well, all of it. When my mother and biological father (sometimes I refer to him as my sperm donor, because I think it's funny, but his name is Chris), got divorced, my dad, Kenny, married my mom resulting in a blended family of me, who was biologically my mom's, and my two brothers, who were biologically his. Suddenly I went from being the only child to being the middle child in a family dynamic that takes a lot of explaining to do. They say divorce and the things I supposedly went through in my early childhood...
Post a Comment
Read more

Melanie and Melanie: Growing up with Separated Lesbian Moms in the South

By
I came from a sperm bank, well I came from a vagina, but first I came from a sperm bank. That’s not generally my opener, but we need to make it clear. My moms discovered their sexuality long before I came along in 1992. When I was three, they separated. Gay marriage had not been legalized up to this point, so there was no divorce process involved. However, my mama, Sharon, she gave birth to me, and she wanted full custody of me. My other mom, Sylvia, worked tirelessly to pay for my existence and Sharon’s pregnancy care; she loved me, and I was her child no matter what. They went to court, and Sylvia became one of the first lesbian parents in the state of Texas to receive shared custody of a child that was not biologically hers. In some cases, this still doesn’t always happen, particularly in cases with gay and lesbian parents, regardless of how involved the parent is in their child’s life. “Who do you want to live with?” Flash forward seven years or so, and I’m being given more...
Post a Comment
Read more

Speech in its essence is not neutral.

By
“All fiction can be profitably regarded as argument” The OED Online defines “profitably” as: “with advantage or benefit; usefully” ("profitably, adv."). “Profitably” caught me off guard, but when I consider it in this junction, I’m inclined to agree. I found this quote in a work by Ronald Sukenick called Narralogues: Truth in Fiction . Sukenick makes this argument after establishing that he finds “significance” through the narrative as opposed to the plot. When I originally read the word “profitably” I felt myself wanting to be in disagreement with the claim because of the monetary implications of “profit.” Then again, I found it hard to make a case for a work of fiction that didn’t stand to gain from profit. We all have writings (and maybe even written narratives) that we don’t plan on showing to the world, but it’s hard to imagine not being willing to exchange those writings when offered money. That’s not an ideal way of thinking, but we don’t live in an ideal world. ...
1 comment
Read more