Who is my favorite
narrator? Well, to be honest, I’ve always been partial to blatantly unreliable
narrators. Chief in Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over
the Cuckoo’s Nest comes to mind. So does Holden Caulfield from J.D.
Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye. I
think I enjoy the unreliability of narrators because it’s a reminder that we
all are pretty unreliable if we were to tell our story. I mean, we can’t know
everything and yet we all have opinions about something. We’ve only got one set
of eyes per person (unless you’re a mutant, then you’re excused from this
conversation, sorry), and we tend to see the world through those eyes alone. As
much as we gain empathy throughout our lives by reading the stories of other
characters fictional and non, there is still a limit to what we can know about
the internal processes of another person. Therefore, we all kinda suck (on a
scale, granted) at reliably telling a story.
So
maybe that’s why it’s refreshing to read the story of McMurphy taking over the
mental hospital from Chief’s eyes. We know he’s paranoid, and we know he thinks
the world is made of machines controlled by Nurse Ratched, but we can’t help by
empathize with him. The Big Nurse is
controlling, and he does seem to have
the right idea by keeping his mouth closed. That’s why the big plan at the end
of the book works so well, after all. And really, we’re all a little crazy so reading his perspective
feels both out of control and perfectly sensible all at once. The only
difference between us and Chief is that our metaphors for the things we fear in
our lives are his actual hallucinations. That’s all.
Same
thing with Holden. We know he’s an angsty teenager who’s wandering the streets and
looking for something despite not knowing what that something is, but the way
he tells his story (which is plotless, by the way) gives us a brand new angle
into the thoughts of a teenager who has no idea what he’s doing. Although there
are moments in the book when we want to shake our heads at his immature thought
processes, we also can’t deny that many of them passed through our own brains
at his age.
I
guess what I’m trying to say is that unreliable narrators sometimes have the
ability to show us little glimpses of truths about ourselves that we haven’t
addressed or maybe don’t want to. Maybe that’s why we hide them under narrators
we don’t fully trust to tell the story with complete accuracy. It’s easier to
write off those hard truths if we don’t put full trust in the storyteller,
right? But don’t take it from me. God only knows if I’ve demonstrated why I
like unreliable narrators correctly or not.
Comments
Post a Comment