Skip to main content

"I know it's crazy but..."

Image
By

Who is my favorite narrator? Well, to be honest, I’ve always been partial to blatantly unreliable narrators. Chief in Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest comes to mind. So does Holden Caulfield from J.D. Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye. I think I enjoy the unreliability of narrators because it’s a reminder that we all are pretty unreliable if we were to tell our story. I mean, we can’t know everything and yet we all have opinions about something. We’ve only got one set of eyes per person (unless you’re a mutant, then you’re excused from this conversation, sorry), and we tend to see the world through those eyes alone. As much as we gain empathy throughout our lives by reading the stories of other characters fictional and non, there is still a limit to what we can know about the internal processes of another person. Therefore, we all kinda suck (on a scale, granted) at reliably telling a story.

            So maybe that’s why it’s refreshing to read the story of McMurphy taking over the mental hospital from Chief’s eyes. We know he’s paranoid, and we know he thinks the world is made of machines controlled by Nurse Ratched, but we can’t help by empathize with him. The Big Nurse is controlling, and he does seem to have the right idea by keeping his mouth closed. That’s why the big plan at the end of the book works so well, after all. And really, we’re all a little crazy so reading his perspective feels both out of control and perfectly sensible all at once. The only difference between us and Chief is that our metaphors for the things we fear in our lives are his actual hallucinations. That’s all.

            Same thing with Holden. We know he’s an angsty teenager who’s wandering the streets and looking for something despite not knowing what that something is, but the way he tells his story (which is plotless, by the way) gives us a brand new angle into the thoughts of a teenager who has no idea what he’s doing. Although there are moments in the book when we want to shake our heads at his immature thought processes, we also can’t deny that many of them passed through our own brains at his age.

            I guess what I’m trying to say is that unreliable narrators sometimes have the ability to show us little glimpses of truths about ourselves that we haven’t addressed or maybe don’t want to. Maybe that’s why we hide them under narrators we don’t fully trust to tell the story with complete accuracy. It’s easier to write off those hard truths if we don’t put full trust in the storyteller, right? But don’t take it from me. God only knows if I’ve demonstrated why I like unreliable narrators correctly or not.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Melanie and Melanie: Growing up with Separated Lesbian Moms in the South

By Anonymous
I came from a sperm bank, well I came from a vagina, but first I came from a sperm bank. That’s not generally my opener, but we need to make it clear. My moms discovered their sexuality long before I came along in 1992. When I was three, they separated. Gay marriage had not been legalized up to this point, so there was no divorce process involved. However, my mama, Sharon, she gave birth to me, and she wanted full custody of me. My other mom, Sylvia, worked tirelessly to pay for my existence and Sharon’s pregnancy care; she loved me, and I was her child no matter what. They went to court, and Sylvia became one of the first lesbian parents in the state of Texas to receive shared custody of a child that was not biologically hers. In some cases, this still doesn’t always happen, particularly in cases with gay and lesbian parents, regardless of how involved the parent is in their child’s life. “Who do you want to live with?” Flash forward seven years or so, and I’m being given more...
Post a Comment
Read more

Speech in its essence is not neutral.

By Anonymous
“All fiction can be profitably regarded as argument” The OED Online defines “profitably” as: “with advantage or benefit; usefully” ("profitably, adv."). “Profitably” caught me off guard, but when I consider it in this junction, I’m inclined to agree. I found this quote in a work by Ronald Sukenick called Narralogues: Truth in Fiction . Sukenick makes this argument after establishing that he finds “significance” through the narrative as opposed to the plot. When I originally read the word “profitably” I felt myself wanting to be in disagreement with the claim because of the monetary implications of “profit.” Then again, I found it hard to make a case for a work of fiction that didn’t stand to gain from profit. We all have writings (and maybe even written narratives) that we don’t plan on showing to the world, but it’s hard to imagine not being willing to exchange those writings when offered money. That’s not an ideal way of thinking, but we don’t live in an ideal world. ...
1 comment
Read more

All Pickles Were Once Cucumbers

By Anonymous
I tried to take a more literary approach towards something that disrupts its canon, but I came up short. I thought about a lot of crossover episodes that seemed violating like when they did the whole Scandal/How to Get Away With Murder thing for the fans. Granted it worked, and now I’ve watched Scandal . Also, the “Uncle Grandpa” episode from Steven Universe was super annoying to me, but it is a children’s show and I probably shouldn’t complain about it. What I realized, instead, is that there are a lot of shows that break their canon of probability in ways that work- you may have already guessed which one I’m going with. The Living Handbook of Narratology explores the foundation of possible worlds: “The foundation of PW theory is the idea that reality—conceived as the sum of the imaginable rather than as the sum of what exists physically—is a universe composed of a plurality of distinct worlds. This universe is hierarchically structured by the opposition of one element, ...
Post a Comment
Read more