Skip to main content

Love always, Charlie

"Who is your favorite narrator?"

What a loaded question for a book-loving, story-telling junkie like myself. I've pondered long and hard about this question, and my answer seems to change a lot. A part of me wants to choose someone of high-brow literature, but that isn't me. And that's okay. I thought at first I would pick Esther Greenwood of Sylvia Plath's The Bell Jar. I always come back to, "I am, I am, I am" when I get a dose of impostor syndrome (it happens a lot, grad school is hard ok). However, I am going to have to choose Charlie from The Perks of Being a Wallflower, my favorite novel of all time.

"Why?" my own mother asked, when I told her about this blog post. Well, I have many reasons for Charlie being my favorite narrator, and the first being that this book is home for me. My copy is a bit battered, dog-eared, and highlighted. This was the book that I turned to when my great-grandmother passed away from ovarian cancer. This was the book I turned to when I went through a bad breakup, or had fights with my parents, and it's a book I've gone to recently when my anxiety was at an all time high and panic attacks were becoming more and more frequent. Charlie, as a narrator, is so comforting to me. The novel is organized as a series of letters written from Charlie to an unnamed person. Each letter begins with, "Dear friend," and ends with "Love always, Charlie." I realize Charlie is a fictional character, but I feel like he understands me on a personal and emotionally intimate manner. Charlie as a narrator telling his story though his letters makes me feel as though I have a friendship with Charlie. The letters are to me, and me alone. As I'm typing this, I feel silly admitting that I consider this fictional, teenage boy narrator to be a real friend, ready to be taken down from my shelf in any time of need, but it is what it is. There's a passage that has always stuck with me when I am feeling anxious:

“Please believe that things are good with me, and even when they're not, they will be soon enough. And I will always believe the same about you.”

That being said, Charlie will always unashamedly be my favorite narrator. And if anyone needs a fictional friend to run home to, I recommend Charlie. And to Stephen Chbosky, thank you. From the bottom of my heart, thank you for Charlie. 

Love always,
Allyson 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Melanie and Melanie: Growing up with Separated Lesbian Moms in the South

I came from a sperm bank, well I came from a vagina, but first I came from a sperm bank. That’s not generally my opener, but we need to make it clear. My moms discovered their sexuality long before I came along in 1992. When I was three, they separated. Gay marriage had not been legalized up to this point, so there was no divorce process involved. However, my mama, Sharon, she gave birth to me, and she wanted full custody of me. My other mom, Sylvia, worked tirelessly to pay for my existence and Sharon’s pregnancy care; she loved me, and I was her child no matter what. They went to court, and Sylvia became one of the first lesbian parents in the state of Texas to receive shared custody of a child that was not biologically hers. In some cases, this still doesn’t always happen, particularly in cases with gay and lesbian parents, regardless of how involved the parent is in their child’s life. “Who do you want to live with?” Flash forward seven years or so, and I’m being given more...

Speech in its essence is not neutral.

“All fiction can be profitably regarded as argument” The OED Online defines “profitably” as: “with advantage or benefit; usefully” ("profitably, adv."). “Profitably” caught me off guard, but when I consider it in this junction, I’m inclined to agree. I found this quote in a work by Ronald Sukenick called Narralogues: Truth in Fiction . Sukenick makes this argument after establishing that he finds “significance” through the narrative as opposed to the plot. When I originally read the word “profitably” I felt myself wanting to be in disagreement with the claim because of the monetary implications of “profit.” Then again, I found it hard to make a case for a work of fiction that didn’t stand to gain from profit. We all have writings (and maybe even written narratives) that we don’t plan on showing to the world, but it’s hard to imagine not being willing to exchange those writings when offered money. That’s not an ideal way of thinking, but we don’t live in an ideal world. ...

All Pickles Were Once Cucumbers

I tried to take a more literary approach towards something that disrupts its canon, but I came up short. I thought about a lot of crossover episodes that seemed violating like when they did the whole Scandal/How to Get Away With Murder thing for the fans. Granted it worked, and now I’ve watched Scandal . Also, the “Uncle Grandpa” episode from Steven Universe was super annoying to me, but it is a children’s show and I probably shouldn’t complain about it. What I realized, instead, is that there are a lot of shows that break their canon of probability in ways that work- you may have already guessed which one I’m going with. The Living Handbook of Narratology explores the foundation of possible worlds: “The foundation of PW theory is the idea that reality—conceived as the sum of the imaginable rather than as the sum of what exists physically—is a universe composed of a plurality of distinct worlds. This universe is hierarchically structured by the opposition of one element, ...