Realtor by Day, Narrative Destroyer by Night

This fantastic news update (https://www.valdostadailytimes.com/opinion/columns/sotu-a-wall-changing-the-narrative/article_7b4a4f29-2fce-58aa-9c5f-bff2a0e7abb8.html) posted by the Valdosta Daily Times presents itself as a pretty good example of using narrative as a tool in daily life. This article seems to be an attempt by a very pro-Trump staff writer to “pwn the libs” by harnessing the power of narrative. Gary Weisenbaker, Valdosta Daily Times staff writer and career realtor, makes a lot of fun claims about the impact of a “liberal narrative” but my favorite has to be when he mentions that this narrative seeks to “change the narrative and chastise those Americans who choose work over welfare, life over abortion and the rule of law governing immigration over lawlessness and, of course, excoriate those who, by working hard or having an entrepreneurial spirit, have improved their financial position in life.”

Throughout this article, Weisenbaker is both attacking the use of narrative by those on the opposing side of his argument, while also utilizing narrative to pull support to his side. Time and time again he speaks about how Democratic Socialists wish to “change the current narrative” and reform aspects of America that no longer work for the majority of people. However, since they have been in place forever, and help to support higher classes, he is obviously opposed to the editing of this narrative. Though he approaches it in a much harsher manner that seeks to demonize and belittle the opposition. While doing this, Weisenbaker is also developing a narrative of his own, or participating in one that already exists, that is actively working to convince the readers of this article to believe *his* version of things, so that those seeking to change the current narrative are rendered unable.

I thought it would be interesting to use this article because it shows how depending on where you’re sitting, the most fitting narrative for the situation can change dramatically. And, if we look at it that way, it also shows how multiple narratives can occur within close proximity of one another and still run parallel. That disagreement (or simply inability to agree) in tight quarters illuminates the ability for certain narratives to disadvantage another one. Regardless of which side of this particular narrative you support, the participation in it will directly disadvantage the opposition.

Comments

Melanie and Melanie: Growing up with Separated Lesbian Moms in the South

I came from a sperm bank, well I came from a vagina, but first I came from a sperm bank. That’s not generally my opener, but we need to make it clear. My moms discovered their sexuality long before I came along in 1992. When I was three, they separated. Gay marriage had not been legalized up to this point, so there was no divorce process involved. However, my mama, Sharon, she gave birth to me, and she wanted full custody of me. My other mom, Sylvia, worked tirelessly to pay for my existence and Sharon’s pregnancy care; she loved me, and I was her child no matter what. They went to court, and Sylvia became one of the first lesbian parents in the state of Texas to receive shared custody of a child that was not biologically hers. In some cases, this still doesn’t always happen, particularly in cases with gay and lesbian parents, regardless of how involved the parent is in their child’s life. “Who do you want to live with?” Flash forward seven years or so, and I’m being given more...

Speech in its essence is not neutral.

“All fiction can be profitably regarded as argument” The OED Online defines “profitably” as: “with advantage or benefit; usefully” ("profitably, adv."). “Profitably” caught me off guard, but when I consider it in this junction, I’m inclined to agree. I found this quote in a work by Ronald Sukenick called Narralogues: Truth in Fiction . Sukenick makes this argument after establishing that he finds “significance” through the narrative as opposed to the plot. When I originally read the word “profitably” I felt myself wanting to be in disagreement with the claim because of the monetary implications of “profit.” Then again, I found it hard to make a case for a work of fiction that didn’t stand to gain from profit. We all have writings (and maybe even written narratives) that we don’t plan on showing to the world, but it’s hard to imagine not being willing to exchange those writings when offered money. That’s not an ideal way of thinking, but we don’t live in an ideal world. ...

All Pickles Were Once Cucumbers

I tried to take a more literary approach towards something that disrupts its canon, but I came up short. I thought about a lot of crossover episodes that seemed violating like when they did the whole Scandal/How to Get Away With Murder thing for the fans. Granted it worked, and now I’ve watched Scandal . Also, the “Uncle Grandpa” episode from Steven Universe was super annoying to me, but it is a children’s show and I probably shouldn’t complain about it. What I realized, instead, is that there are a lot of shows that break their canon of probability in ways that work- you may have already guessed which one I’m going with. The Living Handbook of Narratology explores the foundation of possible worlds: “The foundation of PW theory is the idea that reality—conceived as the sum of the imaginable rather than as the sum of what exists physically—is a universe composed of a plurality of distinct worlds. This universe is hierarchically structured by the opposition of one element, ...

ENG 6283: Narrative Theory

Search This Blog