I love it when books lie to me.

*Spoilers for The Wife Between Us lie below*

I love it when a book lies to me. There’s something about a suspicious or unreliable narrator that really gets me to devour a novel. That being said, my favorite narrator at this moment (because we all know favorite books and narrators change as soon as you read the next “great” book) is Vanessa from The Wife Between Us by Greer Hendricks and Sarah Pekkanen.

In this psychological thriller, an angry ex-wife stalks her ex-husband’ss young fiancée. The story unfolds through multiple viewpoints...or so it seems. In Vanessa’s chapters, the narrator is homodiegetic and intradiegetic. Vanessa narrates in first-person as a character of the story. In Nellie’s chapters, the narrator is heterodiegetic and intradiegetic. This puts some distance between the reader and Nellie’s experiences. It is not until part two of the novel that the reader discovers that Vanessa is Nellie (Nellie was the nickname her ex-husband called her) and the woman Vanessa is stalking is named Emma. Therefore, the chapters in which we have an “unknown” narrator, are actually narrated by Vanessa herself. She is telling the readers about her past but the authors have written it to mislead the audience.

Vanessa is clearly unhinged, but she’s been through a lot so the reader ends up rooting for her. At least I did. According to Per Krogh Hansen’s four types of unreliability, Vanessa is an intertextual unreliable narrator. This means the unreliability is based off the character’s identity more than the narrator’s discourse. Since Vanessa is an emotional drunk at this point in her life, the reader can assume that her narration is, at least a little, skewed.

I found it very clever that the novel went from seeming to have two narrators to only having one. It was a trick performed beautifully by Hendricks and Pekkanen. It provided the novel with so many layers to work through during the first half of the book and after, once the veil of deceit was lifted.

Comments

Melanie and Melanie: Growing up with Separated Lesbian Moms in the South

I came from a sperm bank, well I came from a vagina, but first I came from a sperm bank. That’s not generally my opener, but we need to make it clear. My moms discovered their sexuality long before I came along in 1992. When I was three, they separated. Gay marriage had not been legalized up to this point, so there was no divorce process involved. However, my mama, Sharon, she gave birth to me, and she wanted full custody of me. My other mom, Sylvia, worked tirelessly to pay for my existence and Sharon’s pregnancy care; she loved me, and I was her child no matter what. They went to court, and Sylvia became one of the first lesbian parents in the state of Texas to receive shared custody of a child that was not biologically hers. In some cases, this still doesn’t always happen, particularly in cases with gay and lesbian parents, regardless of how involved the parent is in their child’s life. “Who do you want to live with?” Flash forward seven years or so, and I’m being given more...

Speech in its essence is not neutral.

“All fiction can be profitably regarded as argument” The OED Online defines “profitably” as: “with advantage or benefit; usefully” ("profitably, adv."). “Profitably” caught me off guard, but when I consider it in this junction, I’m inclined to agree. I found this quote in a work by Ronald Sukenick called Narralogues: Truth in Fiction . Sukenick makes this argument after establishing that he finds “significance” through the narrative as opposed to the plot. When I originally read the word “profitably” I felt myself wanting to be in disagreement with the claim because of the monetary implications of “profit.” Then again, I found it hard to make a case for a work of fiction that didn’t stand to gain from profit. We all have writings (and maybe even written narratives) that we don’t plan on showing to the world, but it’s hard to imagine not being willing to exchange those writings when offered money. That’s not an ideal way of thinking, but we don’t live in an ideal world. ...

All Pickles Were Once Cucumbers

I tried to take a more literary approach towards something that disrupts its canon, but I came up short. I thought about a lot of crossover episodes that seemed violating like when they did the whole Scandal/How to Get Away With Murder thing for the fans. Granted it worked, and now I’ve watched Scandal . Also, the “Uncle Grandpa” episode from Steven Universe was super annoying to me, but it is a children’s show and I probably shouldn’t complain about it. What I realized, instead, is that there are a lot of shows that break their canon of probability in ways that work- you may have already guessed which one I’m going with. The Living Handbook of Narratology explores the foundation of possible worlds: “The foundation of PW theory is the idea that reality—conceived as the sum of the imaginable rather than as the sum of what exists physically—is a universe composed of a plurality of distinct worlds. This universe is hierarchically structured by the opposition of one element, ...

ENG 6283: Narrative Theory

Search This Blog