Skip to main content

The Big Sea



When I think of lost narratives, I think of the stories that aren't passed down to or between generations. The stories that aren't said in between drags in a gas station parking lot, or the stories you think about when you look at a person across the way in a subway car. Or,t he stories you think you know, but you really, really don't know them at all.

Ignorance is not bliss.

This photo reminds me of all the stories, memories, and experiences that I've never had, and possibly will never get to have in the future. It's a photo scanning the border of Miyajima Island in Hiroshima Bay. The water, much like the shores of Galveston, is murky and deep. As we sailed into the docking station, I wondered about the people who protect the shrines and keep the traditions and legends of the majestic tor-ii gate. How do they work to keep those legends alive? Is there a constant effort of rallying listeners to hear how the tor-ii gate came to be? Or is it much simpler than that?

Maybe those stories never became lost at all.



There's a requirement of participation between the narrator/storyteller and narratee/listener in order for a story to remain alive, and found. But there's a part of me that believes that there aren't any "lost" stories--if we've heard, seen, or read it somewhere, we know it, right? It's not the same as a forgotten story, or a story that's undergone so many revisions or alterations that we miss out on the vibrancy and attraction of the original. Then again, I'm thinking that the process of forgetfulness and loss go hand-in-hand when searching for lost stories. All in all, I think it boils down to perception: which stories do we believe to be lost to us, forgotten to us, or both?

Take Bing Bong from Inside Out, for example



Bing Bong strives to keep Riley happy during her younger years. He makes her happy, and her happiness is his pride and joy. Their rainbow-powered legendary wagon took them everywhere she wanted to go. But then....Riley got older, and Bing Bong was forgotten. On top of that, his stories became lost to Riley, and I think that's why Bing Bong's character development is so powerful. We all recognize and understand what it's like to both forget and lose, and to forget a story/person/event. But do we, as narrators and storytellers put as much stock into thinking about our own lost narratives/stories?

This is a topic I think I'd like to explore in a global context: what are the lost narratives of travelers, and how do we recognize and appreciate those narratives/stories once we find them? How can I use my travels overseas and encounters with others to inform readers of this dilemma?







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Melanie and Melanie: Growing up with Separated Lesbian Moms in the South

I came from a sperm bank, well I came from a vagina, but first I came from a sperm bank. That’s not generally my opener, but we need to make it clear. My moms discovered their sexuality long before I came along in 1992. When I was three, they separated. Gay marriage had not been legalized up to this point, so there was no divorce process involved. However, my mama, Sharon, she gave birth to me, and she wanted full custody of me. My other mom, Sylvia, worked tirelessly to pay for my existence and Sharon’s pregnancy care; she loved me, and I was her child no matter what. They went to court, and Sylvia became one of the first lesbian parents in the state of Texas to receive shared custody of a child that was not biologically hers. In some cases, this still doesn’t always happen, particularly in cases with gay and lesbian parents, regardless of how involved the parent is in their child’s life. “Who do you want to live with?” Flash forward seven years or so, and I’m being given more...

Speech in its essence is not neutral.

“All fiction can be profitably regarded as argument” The OED Online defines “profitably” as: “with advantage or benefit; usefully” ("profitably, adv."). “Profitably” caught me off guard, but when I consider it in this junction, I’m inclined to agree. I found this quote in a work by Ronald Sukenick called Narralogues: Truth in Fiction . Sukenick makes this argument after establishing that he finds “significance” through the narrative as opposed to the plot. When I originally read the word “profitably” I felt myself wanting to be in disagreement with the claim because of the monetary implications of “profit.” Then again, I found it hard to make a case for a work of fiction that didn’t stand to gain from profit. We all have writings (and maybe even written narratives) that we don’t plan on showing to the world, but it’s hard to imagine not being willing to exchange those writings when offered money. That’s not an ideal way of thinking, but we don’t live in an ideal world. ...

All Pickles Were Once Cucumbers

I tried to take a more literary approach towards something that disrupts its canon, but I came up short. I thought about a lot of crossover episodes that seemed violating like when they did the whole Scandal/How to Get Away With Murder thing for the fans. Granted it worked, and now I’ve watched Scandal . Also, the “Uncle Grandpa” episode from Steven Universe was super annoying to me, but it is a children’s show and I probably shouldn’t complain about it. What I realized, instead, is that there are a lot of shows that break their canon of probability in ways that work- you may have already guessed which one I’m going with. The Living Handbook of Narratology explores the foundation of possible worlds: “The foundation of PW theory is the idea that reality—conceived as the sum of the imaginable rather than as the sum of what exists physically—is a universe composed of a plurality of distinct worlds. This universe is hierarchically structured by the opposition of one element, ...