what the friggin' frig is a narrator???

I’m going to be absolutely 100% honest with y’all. I have no idea how to answer this question. When I first saw the blog prompt (and before I did the readings) I thought that I had the perfect answer: me. My pre-reading train of thought was that narrator and storyteller would be interchangeable definitions here. Who else could be my favorite narrator besides myself? I enjoy the stories I tell the most, because I also participated in them, so it makes sense that I would come to this conclusion. However, this was naive, pre-reading Nicole and we now know that’s probably not the best answer now.

The problem is that I don’t know what the/an actual answer to this question would be if I were to structure it around the definition provided in the handbook. There’s one part of their definition that really threw me for a loop and is making this particularly hard. The definition mentions that the narrator and author are not the same, which I understand and consider an important distinction, but then it mentions that the author is a real person, which implies that the narrator is not a real person. If the narrator is not a real person, that means that I cannot be my favorite narrator, because I am, ya know, a person (I think).

So, now I’m left with two possible directions to head in. First, I can assume that this question is asking me what kind of narrator I enjoy to read from the perspective of when I’m reading. For example, the unreliable narrator, first person, third person, etc. If that’s the case, I’m not really sure that I have one. Each piece of writing I read is fulfilling a different purpose and will need to be told from different angles, so I wouldn’t be able to pick a favorite, because I think that each serves a purpose. The other angle would be assuming that this question is asking which narrator from a specific novel/story I like the most. However, this is a question that I also cannot answer, because I’m not quite sure if narrator does or does not mean the same thing as a character in the story.

The short answer to this prompt is: idk. Each week I think that I’ve grasped a concept and then the next week it is torn to shreds by another piece of literature. At the moment I’m not sure what to believe, so the answer to this question seems especially difficult.

Comments

Melanie and Melanie: Growing up with Separated Lesbian Moms in the South

I came from a sperm bank, well I came from a vagina, but first I came from a sperm bank. That’s not generally my opener, but we need to make it clear. My moms discovered their sexuality long before I came along in 1992. When I was three, they separated. Gay marriage had not been legalized up to this point, so there was no divorce process involved. However, my mama, Sharon, she gave birth to me, and she wanted full custody of me. My other mom, Sylvia, worked tirelessly to pay for my existence and Sharon’s pregnancy care; she loved me, and I was her child no matter what. They went to court, and Sylvia became one of the first lesbian parents in the state of Texas to receive shared custody of a child that was not biologically hers. In some cases, this still doesn’t always happen, particularly in cases with gay and lesbian parents, regardless of how involved the parent is in their child’s life. “Who do you want to live with?” Flash forward seven years or so, and I’m being given more...

Speech in its essence is not neutral.

“All fiction can be profitably regarded as argument” The OED Online defines “profitably” as: “with advantage or benefit; usefully” ("profitably, adv."). “Profitably” caught me off guard, but when I consider it in this junction, I’m inclined to agree. I found this quote in a work by Ronald Sukenick called Narralogues: Truth in Fiction . Sukenick makes this argument after establishing that he finds “significance” through the narrative as opposed to the plot. When I originally read the word “profitably” I felt myself wanting to be in disagreement with the claim because of the monetary implications of “profit.” Then again, I found it hard to make a case for a work of fiction that didn’t stand to gain from profit. We all have writings (and maybe even written narratives) that we don’t plan on showing to the world, but it’s hard to imagine not being willing to exchange those writings when offered money. That’s not an ideal way of thinking, but we don’t live in an ideal world. ...

All Pickles Were Once Cucumbers

I tried to take a more literary approach towards something that disrupts its canon, but I came up short. I thought about a lot of crossover episodes that seemed violating like when they did the whole Scandal/How to Get Away With Murder thing for the fans. Granted it worked, and now I’ve watched Scandal . Also, the “Uncle Grandpa” episode from Steven Universe was super annoying to me, but it is a children’s show and I probably shouldn’t complain about it. What I realized, instead, is that there are a lot of shows that break their canon of probability in ways that work- you may have already guessed which one I’m going with. The Living Handbook of Narratology explores the foundation of possible worlds: “The foundation of PW theory is the idea that reality—conceived as the sum of the imaginable rather than as the sum of what exists physically—is a universe composed of a plurality of distinct worlds. This universe is hierarchically structured by the opposition of one element, ...

ENG 6283: Narrative Theory

Search This Blog