Skip to main content

Voices from Below

It is, to my mind, an undeniable fact that all areas of academic study benefit from the effective use of narrative. Literature, history, and the arts are natural candidates, yet even the maths and sciences can be enriched by including the human voices of those involved, telling us the story of what they discovered, how they did it, and what it means for humanity.

What strikes me, though, is that the voices of those on the ground outside of the ivory tower of academe are still rarely heard, and even more rarely acknowledged and valued.

In history, I want to hear more of the voices of those who did not "win," the so-called conquered peoples, the indigenous peoples, those crushed under the heel of imperialism. Some corrective measures have been taken to include these voices in the last few decades, but I know there is mountains more to be discovered.

In the field of medical science, I want to hear the voices of those who unwillingly gave up their lives for our knowledge of disease and treatment, like those experimented upon and murdered in Puerto Rico or in Tuskeegee. I want to hear the voices of traditional healers, whose knowledge was taken even as the land that gave birth to it was stolen from beneath them.

In political theory, particularly here in the United States, I want to hear the voices of the rank and file, of the revolutionaries, the socialists, the anarchists, the sovereign indigenous activists, the low income city dwellers who construct their own direct action networks to meet their own needs as the superstructure has long since abandoned them. I want to hear those who challenge the status quo, who do not search endlessly for ways to justify an unjust system.

I want to hear from working class academics as well, those of us who do not live off of loans or off of generous parents, who work long hours and then come to class to pump our already exhausted brains. I want to hear from those who are eaten up and spat back out by the university system, whose faces are proudly displayed on billboards which celebrate diversity, even as they struggle to get their needs met by the very same institution.

There are so many more whose voices are never heard, but from whose bodies, minds, and toils academics extract knowledge. Not only do they deserve to be heard, but our work as academics suffer for wanting of these stories. They contain the wisdom of lived experience, of bearing the brunt of the policies put into place under the guidance of our theories, of what is truly done upon the backs of the poor so that we may gain.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Melanie and Melanie: Growing up with Separated Lesbian Moms in the South

I came from a sperm bank, well I came from a vagina, but first I came from a sperm bank. That’s not generally my opener, but we need to make it clear. My moms discovered their sexuality long before I came along in 1992. When I was three, they separated. Gay marriage had not been legalized up to this point, so there was no divorce process involved. However, my mama, Sharon, she gave birth to me, and she wanted full custody of me. My other mom, Sylvia, worked tirelessly to pay for my existence and Sharon’s pregnancy care; she loved me, and I was her child no matter what. They went to court, and Sylvia became one of the first lesbian parents in the state of Texas to receive shared custody of a child that was not biologically hers. In some cases, this still doesn’t always happen, particularly in cases with gay and lesbian parents, regardless of how involved the parent is in their child’s life. “Who do you want to live with?” Flash forward seven years or so, and I’m being given more...

Speech in its essence is not neutral.

“All fiction can be profitably regarded as argument” The OED Online defines “profitably” as: “with advantage or benefit; usefully” ("profitably, adv."). “Profitably” caught me off guard, but when I consider it in this junction, I’m inclined to agree. I found this quote in a work by Ronald Sukenick called Narralogues: Truth in Fiction . Sukenick makes this argument after establishing that he finds “significance” through the narrative as opposed to the plot. When I originally read the word “profitably” I felt myself wanting to be in disagreement with the claim because of the monetary implications of “profit.” Then again, I found it hard to make a case for a work of fiction that didn’t stand to gain from profit. We all have writings (and maybe even written narratives) that we don’t plan on showing to the world, but it’s hard to imagine not being willing to exchange those writings when offered money. That’s not an ideal way of thinking, but we don’t live in an ideal world. ...

All Pickles Were Once Cucumbers

I tried to take a more literary approach towards something that disrupts its canon, but I came up short. I thought about a lot of crossover episodes that seemed violating like when they did the whole Scandal/How to Get Away With Murder thing for the fans. Granted it worked, and now I’ve watched Scandal . Also, the “Uncle Grandpa” episode from Steven Universe was super annoying to me, but it is a children’s show and I probably shouldn’t complain about it. What I realized, instead, is that there are a lot of shows that break their canon of probability in ways that work- you may have already guessed which one I’m going with. The Living Handbook of Narratology explores the foundation of possible worlds: “The foundation of PW theory is the idea that reality—conceived as the sum of the imaginable rather than as the sum of what exists physically—is a universe composed of a plurality of distinct worlds. This universe is hierarchically structured by the opposition of one element, ...