Skip to main content

Combating the Leading Man Narrative

By Anonymous
A few years ago, I was doing research for a paper on fanfiction and came across a Wordpress account about different bending narratives, or narratives that change some aspect of the characters. In the top left corner of the main page was an image with a hashtag: #starringjohncho. Intrigued by the images, I clicked the link and found a series of narratives unlike anything most would call narrative, but telling stories nonetheless.

The social media movement centered on two things: John Cho and Hollywood whitewashing. We’ve mostly moved past displays of painfully blatant whitewashing, like Mickey Rooney in Breakfast at Tiffany’s, but there is still a persistent trend of casting white actors as characters of color, then denying actors of color the opportunities for white roles or roles of undetermined race. It’s a maddening cycle that perpetuates racism in Hollywood, because the producers say there are no big name actors of color, but they refuse to make them.

#starringjohncho looks to bring attention to exactly that problem, and especially as it regards Asian characters. There is no stated reason why John Cho was chosen as the center of this story. Maybe the first person was just a John Cho fan and things spiraled from there. However, Cho makes a good candidate in that he has played traditionally white roles and done it well. He was a modern Henry Higgins in the short-lived 2014 sitcom Selfie, opposite Karen Gillan’s Eliza Doolittle. He’s also played William Shakespeare, albeit in an episode of Drunk History.

What a classy Billy Shakes he makes (x)
The narratives of #starringjohncho are simple: a single image. There is narrative power in a single image, but these are specifically chosen images. Instead of trying to create a new story from scratch, fans posting in the hashtag find movie posters, edit out the white lead actor, and replace him with John Cho. It is an effective way to create a narrative; if the viewer is already somewhat aware of the movie’s plot, the entire narrative has been constructed, but with Cho as the lead. It is a way to show Hollywood how easy it is to cast actors of color. The story doesn’t need to change based on an actor’s heritage.

I liked this movie, and I'd probably like it more with John Cho (x)
This social media movement is no longer widespread, but it certainly caught the attention of major news in its heyday. It circumvents the traditional in favor of the unconventional, with entertaining results that I hope to someday see in a theater near me.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Melanie and Melanie: Growing up with Separated Lesbian Moms in the South

By Anonymous
I came from a sperm bank, well I came from a vagina, but first I came from a sperm bank. That’s not generally my opener, but we need to make it clear. My moms discovered their sexuality long before I came along in 1992. When I was three, they separated. Gay marriage had not been legalized up to this point, so there was no divorce process involved. However, my mama, Sharon, she gave birth to me, and she wanted full custody of me. My other mom, Sylvia, worked tirelessly to pay for my existence and Sharon’s pregnancy care; she loved me, and I was her child no matter what. They went to court, and Sylvia became one of the first lesbian parents in the state of Texas to receive shared custody of a child that was not biologically hers. In some cases, this still doesn’t always happen, particularly in cases with gay and lesbian parents, regardless of how involved the parent is in their child’s life. “Who do you want to live with?” Flash forward seven years or so, and I’m being given more...
Post a Comment
Read more

Speech in its essence is not neutral.

By Anonymous
“All fiction can be profitably regarded as argument” The OED Online defines “profitably” as: “with advantage or benefit; usefully” ("profitably, adv."). “Profitably” caught me off guard, but when I consider it in this junction, I’m inclined to agree. I found this quote in a work by Ronald Sukenick called Narralogues: Truth in Fiction . Sukenick makes this argument after establishing that he finds “significance” through the narrative as opposed to the plot. When I originally read the word “profitably” I felt myself wanting to be in disagreement with the claim because of the monetary implications of “profit.” Then again, I found it hard to make a case for a work of fiction that didn’t stand to gain from profit. We all have writings (and maybe even written narratives) that we don’t plan on showing to the world, but it’s hard to imagine not being willing to exchange those writings when offered money. That’s not an ideal way of thinking, but we don’t live in an ideal world. ...
1 comment
Read more

All Pickles Were Once Cucumbers

By Anonymous
I tried to take a more literary approach towards something that disrupts its canon, but I came up short. I thought about a lot of crossover episodes that seemed violating like when they did the whole Scandal/How to Get Away With Murder thing for the fans. Granted it worked, and now I’ve watched Scandal . Also, the “Uncle Grandpa” episode from Steven Universe was super annoying to me, but it is a children’s show and I probably shouldn’t complain about it. What I realized, instead, is that there are a lot of shows that break their canon of probability in ways that work- you may have already guessed which one I’m going with. The Living Handbook of Narratology explores the foundation of possible worlds: “The foundation of PW theory is the idea that reality—conceived as the sum of the imaginable rather than as the sum of what exists physically—is a universe composed of a plurality of distinct worlds. This universe is hierarchically structured by the opposition of one element, ...
Post a Comment
Read more