Skip to main content

It's all about the context. I think.

Image
By

Here's the rub: At the center of narratives/stories/rhetoric/whatever you want to call it, there is a speaker, a claim, and an audience. The speaker has a certain context and idea they want to transfer to their audience, and that speaker must also interact with circulating contexts, ideals, and expectations that exist within their audience and environment they choose to share their message. Within every interaction or shared message there’s a statement that is trying to do one (or all) of the following:


  •          Entertain
  •          Inform
  •          Persuade
  •          Educate

What I propose is this: Yes, Abbott is correct in saying that "All fiction can be profitably regarded as argument." However, I think the context surrounding the fiction can alter the appearance or acknowledgement of the fiction/argument by the audience. If the context or environment surrounding a piece of fiction is used purposely to confuse readers, then I can see how Abbott’s statement might be construed as incorrect. This is especially prevalent in pieces of fiction that are meant to redirect the reader, like Magic for Humans or Stranger Things. However, we have to keep in mind that if we as audience members go into a piece of fiction having some awareness that the fiction is meant to redirect us in some way, that awareness might dilute Abbott’s idea.

But I want to talk a bit about the word profitably for a minute. Abbott is saying in this case, argument propels fiction forward and gives the characters, narrator, narratee, and (dare I say) readers, more diversity than a piece of fiction/message that does not contain an argument. I think there's a reason that profitably is placed in Abbott's statement--he realizes that a story and piece of fiction cannot flourish without some form of conflict/argument or purpose to move the fiction along for audiences. Regardless of the intent (entertainment,informative, persuasion, education, or otherwise), without an argument or representation of an argument a piece of fiction and all parties within it remain static. This results in fiction that can likely become distant to its readers/audiences. Profitability is directly related to the complexity and movement of character/plot development. 

So, overall I do agree that fiction can be profitably regarded as argument but we need to remember to be cognizant of how context can illuminate or hide the intent/argument that's being regarded as fiction. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Melanie and Melanie: Growing up with Separated Lesbian Moms in the South

By
I came from a sperm bank, well I came from a vagina, but first I came from a sperm bank. That’s not generally my opener, but we need to make it clear. My moms discovered their sexuality long before I came along in 1992. When I was three, they separated. Gay marriage had not been legalized up to this point, so there was no divorce process involved. However, my mama, Sharon, she gave birth to me, and she wanted full custody of me. My other mom, Sylvia, worked tirelessly to pay for my existence and Sharon’s pregnancy care; she loved me, and I was her child no matter what. They went to court, and Sylvia became one of the first lesbian parents in the state of Texas to receive shared custody of a child that was not biologically hers. In some cases, this still doesn’t always happen, particularly in cases with gay and lesbian parents, regardless of how involved the parent is in their child’s life. “Who do you want to live with?” Flash forward seven years or so, and I’m being given more
Post a Comment
Read more

Voices from Below

By
It is, to my mind, an undeniable fact that all areas of academic study benefit from the effective use of narrative. Literature, history, and the arts are natural candidates, yet even the maths and sciences can be enriched by including the human voices of those involved, telling us the story of what they discovered, how they did it, and what it means for humanity. What strikes me, though, is that the voices of those on the ground outside of the ivory tower of academe are still rarely heard, and even more rarely acknowledged and valued. In history, I want to hear more of the voices of those who did not "win," the so-called conquered peoples, the indigenous peoples, those crushed under the heel of imperialism. Some corrective measures have been taken to include these voices in the last few decades, but I know there is mountains more to be discovered. In the field of medical science, I want to hear the voices of those who unwillingly gave up their lives for our knowledge of
Post a Comment
Read more

Needs more academic lingo

By
So I heard something funny on a podcast this weekend and it really struck a chord. The hosts, sweet souls that they are, were talking about people who become professors and how they must do it because they really care. After all, it’s not like they’re trying to get famous. I laughed, a lot, because seriously, what academic isn’t trying to make a name for themselves? Becoming faculty means writing and publishing, and getting your name out there while trying to break fresh ground on old material. That’s incredibly clear, given the amount of narrative theory ideas we read about this week.   And the more theories that are created, the more TERMS there are. They’re just everywhere… chrono-logic, fabula, sjuzet, catalyzers.   I mean, I get it, in the basics, but what kills me is how many  different ideas can be created to explain the how’s and why’s of story and narrative. I’ve tried to find a kind of unified theory of narrative theory, and so far, the names t
Post a Comment
Read more