Skip to main content

Lost but not forgotten

On April 24, 1915 hundreds of Armenian scholars and businessmen were rounded up and executed by a political group called the Young Turks. This horrendous act marked the beginning of the Armenian Genocide, during which 1.5 million Armenians were killed. Those who were caught running and weren’t immediately murdered were pushed out into the desert on death marches towards concentration camps. These death marches were hidden under the legal guise of “deportation.”

What occurred in the Ottoman Empire between 1915 and 1917 is not so much a lost narrative - it is far from forgotten - but it is a distorted and corrupted narrative. The Turkish government has gone to great lengths to deny the genocide, hiding their horrendous actions with mass propaganda. The Turkish Nationalists spread confusion through the erasure of records, publication of false “truths,” and interference of the raising of memorial monuments in countries that took in Armenian refugees. They even have given key members of the Young Turks posthumous honors

Only 28 countries recognize the Armenian Genocide as genocide. As of 2019, 49 states in America recognize the genocide but it is not recognized nationally by the U.S. government. It is not taught in schools. It is not in our textbooks. If it weren't for Armenian’s tirelessly telling their stories or their parents’ stories or their grandparents’ stories, most people would not even know about this mass killing.

In 2016, The Promise was released in theaters on April 24, known as Armenian Remembrance Day in Armenian culture, in hopes to teach the general public about the genocide through a fictional narrative. Armenian Weekly writer Slewo Oshana stated in an article regarding the movie, “Stories are one of the most effective tools there is in allowing something to continue to exist, and if it remains unspoken that is also a way of counteracting its power.” The movie grossed roughly $12.4 million and educated some.

However, the Turkish government tried again to cover up this important story. One of the actors in the movie was contacted by a Turkish ambassador before filming began. After the movie’s premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival, there were 55,000 one-star votes on IMDB despite the fact that only a few thousand people had actually seen the movie at the premiere screenings. Then, six weeks before The Promise’s release, a movie titled The Ottoman Luietenant was released. The Ottoman Luietenant followed a similar story as The Promise, specifically the love triangle subplot, except with Turkish sympathies.

The continuous denial and distorting of truths by the Turks exemplify the fragility of narratives. Master narratives are not based on the truth, but the power of the teller and the teller’s rhetoric. It is going to take a lot more than a movie and word-of-mouth to combat the false narratives and reveal the true story of the Armenian Genocide to the public.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Melanie and Melanie: Growing up with Separated Lesbian Moms in the South

I came from a sperm bank, well I came from a vagina, but first I came from a sperm bank. That’s not generally my opener, but we need to make it clear. My moms discovered their sexuality long before I came along in 1992. When I was three, they separated. Gay marriage had not been legalized up to this point, so there was no divorce process involved. However, my mama, Sharon, she gave birth to me, and she wanted full custody of me. My other mom, Sylvia, worked tirelessly to pay for my existence and Sharon’s pregnancy care; she loved me, and I was her child no matter what. They went to court, and Sylvia became one of the first lesbian parents in the state of Texas to receive shared custody of a child that was not biologically hers. In some cases, this still doesn’t always happen, particularly in cases with gay and lesbian parents, regardless of how involved the parent is in their child’s life. “Who do you want to live with?” Flash forward seven years or so, and I’m being given more

Voices from Below

It is, to my mind, an undeniable fact that all areas of academic study benefit from the effective use of narrative. Literature, history, and the arts are natural candidates, yet even the maths and sciences can be enriched by including the human voices of those involved, telling us the story of what they discovered, how they did it, and what it means for humanity. What strikes me, though, is that the voices of those on the ground outside of the ivory tower of academe are still rarely heard, and even more rarely acknowledged and valued. In history, I want to hear more of the voices of those who did not "win," the so-called conquered peoples, the indigenous peoples, those crushed under the heel of imperialism. Some corrective measures have been taken to include these voices in the last few decades, but I know there is mountains more to be discovered. In the field of medical science, I want to hear the voices of those who unwillingly gave up their lives for our knowledge of

Needs more academic lingo

So I heard something funny on a podcast this weekend and it really struck a chord. The hosts, sweet souls that they are, were talking about people who become professors and how they must do it because they really care. After all, it’s not like they’re trying to get famous. I laughed, a lot, because seriously, what academic isn’t trying to make a name for themselves? Becoming faculty means writing and publishing, and getting your name out there while trying to break fresh ground on old material. That’s incredibly clear, given the amount of narrative theory ideas we read about this week.   And the more theories that are created, the more TERMS there are. They’re just everywhere… chrono-logic, fabula, sjuzet, catalyzers.   I mean, I get it, in the basics, but what kills me is how many  different ideas can be created to explain the how’s and why’s of story and narrative. I’ve tried to find a kind of unified theory of narrative theory, and so far, the names t