Skip to main content

Yes, All Fiction

Given that I've written my entire thesis with the idea in mind, I'm inclined to agree that all fiction is argument. Then I remembered that books like The Very Hungry Caterpillar exist.

The star of many storytimes over the past 50 years (x)

It is fictional, and certainly has a narrative in the sense of a defined sequence of events, but the idea that it's an argument is not an easy one to accept. Instead, I'll say that all fiction not intended solely as education is argument. This still includes books at any level of reading as long as the narrative is meant to entertain over instruct.

I say this because when we create a fictional narrative, we are making an argument about our beliefs. Whether we mean to or not, the ideas that help shape who we are will be present in fiction. By incorporating these ideas, a writer is advocating for the audience to listen, to agree with or maybe challenge these ideas. They are saying, "Here's what I think? How about you?"

Take the various adaptations I've been poring over for months. They all make a point about something, whether it be politics or culture or what makes good entertainment, just through their existence. These concepts were woven into the fabric of the narrative, making them essential to the story and presenting the argument to the audience for evaluation. The first two are obvious, and the audience may find themselves actively agreeing or disagreeing. The third is more nuanced, and the audience will still find themselves taking a stand on the argument of what makes good entertainment by thinking, "That was great!" or "It wasn't that funny." Whatever the case, the author is presenting some of their beliefs to the audience as worthy of consideration, and the audience will decide whether or not they were beliefs worth entertaining.

As I think about this more, though, I realize that there is an argument inherent to all fiction. An author publishes their writing because they want people to read it. A director makes a movie because they want people to see it. A storyteller tells a story because they want people to hear it. By bringing it into the world, a fiction argues, "I deserve to be heard." This applies to all fiction.

Even The Very Hungry Caterpillar.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Melanie and Melanie: Growing up with Separated Lesbian Moms in the South

I came from a sperm bank, well I came from a vagina, but first I came from a sperm bank. That’s not generally my opener, but we need to make it clear. My moms discovered their sexuality long before I came along in 1992. When I was three, they separated. Gay marriage had not been legalized up to this point, so there was no divorce process involved. However, my mama, Sharon, she gave birth to me, and she wanted full custody of me. My other mom, Sylvia, worked tirelessly to pay for my existence and Sharon’s pregnancy care; she loved me, and I was her child no matter what. They went to court, and Sylvia became one of the first lesbian parents in the state of Texas to receive shared custody of a child that was not biologically hers. In some cases, this still doesn’t always happen, particularly in cases with gay and lesbian parents, regardless of how involved the parent is in their child’s life. “Who do you want to live with?” Flash forward seven years or so, and I’m being given more...

Speech in its essence is not neutral.

“All fiction can be profitably regarded as argument” The OED Online defines “profitably” as: “with advantage or benefit; usefully” ("profitably, adv."). “Profitably” caught me off guard, but when I consider it in this junction, I’m inclined to agree. I found this quote in a work by Ronald Sukenick called Narralogues: Truth in Fiction . Sukenick makes this argument after establishing that he finds “significance” through the narrative as opposed to the plot. When I originally read the word “profitably” I felt myself wanting to be in disagreement with the claim because of the monetary implications of “profit.” Then again, I found it hard to make a case for a work of fiction that didn’t stand to gain from profit. We all have writings (and maybe even written narratives) that we don’t plan on showing to the world, but it’s hard to imagine not being willing to exchange those writings when offered money. That’s not an ideal way of thinking, but we don’t live in an ideal world. ...

All Pickles Were Once Cucumbers

I tried to take a more literary approach towards something that disrupts its canon, but I came up short. I thought about a lot of crossover episodes that seemed violating like when they did the whole Scandal/How to Get Away With Murder thing for the fans. Granted it worked, and now I’ve watched Scandal . Also, the “Uncle Grandpa” episode from Steven Universe was super annoying to me, but it is a children’s show and I probably shouldn’t complain about it. What I realized, instead, is that there are a lot of shows that break their canon of probability in ways that work- you may have already guessed which one I’m going with. The Living Handbook of Narratology explores the foundation of possible worlds: “The foundation of PW theory is the idea that reality—conceived as the sum of the imaginable rather than as the sum of what exists physically—is a universe composed of a plurality of distinct worlds. This universe is hierarchically structured by the opposition of one element, ...